
This
1981 Mike Easler card, the last gasp of my baseball card collection,
the enfeebled limping night janitor of the Cardboard Gods who flicked
off the lights of heaven's emptied hall, came in a package of cards
produced by a company other than Topps. In 1981, both Fleer and another
company, Donruss, won a long-fought legal battle to topple the monopoly
Topps had on producing the cards of major league baseball players.
While I applaud this in retrospect from an economic and political
standpoint, at the time I hated that such a foundational element of
what had been the most stable aspect of my life was changing. I guess I
was probably going to be through collecting cards in 1981 anyway, but I
do vaguely remember the feeling of disorientation that came with the
news that there were now three complete sets to collect cards from. It
was as if I had been going to the same church for years and all of the
sudden one morning I arrive to find three churches instead of one, each
one promising ease and comfort and rejuvenation and a place in the
afterlife, but imbedded in each of the promises was the threat that if
I chose wrong I'd be isolated and alone in a spiritually impotent
unsanctified shack disconnected from even the illusion of community.
Besides
the sheer fact that there was such a thing as Fleer cards, the thing I
liked least about Fleer cards was that the backs of them were upside
down. On Topps cards, the top of the back corresponded to the left side
of the front. For six years, I had been looking at the photo on the
front of Topps cards, and then flipping and turning the Topps cards so
that the front left became the top of the back. Fleer decided they
could improve on that system, matching the top of the back to the
right
side of the front. This may not sound like a big deal but consider
this: it's now twenty-five years later and I'm still flipping over this
Mike Easler card in such a way that his statistics are upside down.
This has become merely annoying but it was downright anomic when I
first tried to see who the hell this Mike Easler character was.
And
that's another thing. When I finally did get the statistics on the back
of the card in a readable position, I discovered that Mike Easler had
been in and out of the major leagues for as long as I'd been collecting
cards, and he'd been in professional baseball almost as long as I'd
been alive. I can see now that for all his major league seasons
previous to 1980 he was a little-used late season call-up, but I'm sure
at first glance the long-time presence in the majors of a guy I'd never
heard of must have added to the existential dizziness of my initial
moments with the card. At that time, the spring of 1981, I was in 8th
grade and had learned that I was terrible at school, that I no longer
had close friends, that my brother was going away to some boarding
school the next year, that I sucked at basketball and baseball, and
that the focus of my new all-encompassing interest, girls with breasts,
was as hopelessly untouchable to me as a distant alien planet populated
entirely by girls with breasts. And now Mike Easler and his stunning
.338 batting average was here to inform me that I no longer even knew
anything about baseball cards.
pete 'the mil' said...
Hmm..."ANOMIC,"
....social instability resulting from a breakdown of standards and values....personal unrest, alienation, and uncertainty that comes from a lack of purpose or ideals....
Yup, you really nailed that one, chief.
But don't be going all revisionist now and pretending you NEVER bought any packs of baseball cards post-1981...
9:07 AM
This also marked the beginning of the end of card collecting for me because every year after '81 there were more and more companies selling all kinds of cards, thus ending the golden era of card collecting.
I'm all for breaking up big monopolies and fair competition in business, but in this instance, the monopoly that Topps had was for the good of card collector. At least, the card collector who appreciated a simpler time.
To comment, please log in.
Not a member? Register!